Review 2. 12 savage manpower Play by Reginald Rose Performed at the Scott Theatre, 7th March 2004 A Masterson/ parliamentary law Theatre Production Directed by shout Masterson Director Guy Mastersons adaptation of Reginald Roses Pulitzer Prize-winning admit over, 12 Angry Men, is a surprisingly engaging and high-quality output considering the casts soreness; the issues it raises remain topical fifty years after(prenominal) it was written. The play explores the enduring themes of prejudice, stereotypes, peoples convictions and preconceptions. It forces the audition to question their own views, their honourable rest and how they would act in a similar situation. Set on the hottest solar day of the year in New York in 1957, 12 Angry Men is an edgy drama concerning cardinal jurors seeking a firm verdict over a 16-year-old boy on trial run for murdering his father. To most it appears to be an unfold and shut chance, cypher had to find twice about it. 11 jurors immediately balloting to bill the youth to the electric chair, pressure it is a piddle part of murder, but juror 8 (Owen ONeill) is not for certain and merely wants to talk over the facts of the case and his uncertainties concerning the evidence. He questions the opposite jurors decision, rock that a human animation should be outlay some consideration; we cant decide on somebodys life in tailfin minutes!
Discussions of the evidence bump inconsistencies, inaccuracies and personal interpretations of the accuse, the witnesses and the jurors prejudices. Juror 3 (Stephen Frost) has an estranged, violent relationship with his only when son, and transposes his vicious peevishness to the criminate youth. Juror 10 (Phil Nichol) condemns the accused because of his own paranoia; he is affright the scum of the slums might bingle day take control. distributively of the jurors is in turn pique or taken aback by the anger... If you want to lay out a skillful essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper