Running head : Business EthicsBusiness EthicsClient s NameUniversity AffiliationBusiness Ethics1 . Was cover to blame in the Pinto CaseThe crosswalk Pinto national involves the question of ethical responsibleness in ensuring that cars that become available in the mart are safe for use of the people . This issue is relevant because it involves a headspring s valuation of human life . In mid-1960s , fording private road Company , through its president , Arjay Miller , vowed to develop engineer science to ensure the safety of Ford cars . However , heptad historic period thereafter , a Ford Pinto car figured in a car casualty , and this accident led to the remainder of a woman and caused genuinely strict injuries in a thirteen-year-old boy (Dowie 1977The circumstances revolving around the growth and manufacturing of t he Ford Pinto cars would doom that Ford ride Company has responsibility over the fatalityThe subject matter car was developed , foundinged , and manufacture when Japanese and separate companies were competitively gaining a dominant bundle in the market of gnomish cars . Thus , Ford repel Company matte up pressured to create a small car that could join in the ambition (Wills , et alThus , in to go the demand and join the competition , Ford rushed the expend of the Ford Pinto , at the outlay of safety . In the innate(p) course of business , producing a car usually takes to the highest degree forty-three months . However , Ford rushed the production of the Pinto and effected everything in a very short span of twenty-five months . There was therefore tip over haste in the production of the car , and this alone raises interrogation in the word meaning and following of appropriate procedures in the production of cars (Wills , et alMore importantly , Ford engineers made a finding to the effect that the car s en! deavor had a major tarnish . This flaw is in the furnish system of the Pinto model , which was found to be highly hypersensitised to rupturing which could easily lead to explosion (Wills , et al .
Ford Motor Company ignored this flaw since the cars were already in the meeting place line , and the car s designer , Iacocca , obligate non-negotiable specifications Thus , the order did non bother to correct the design and went ahead with production (Wills , et solo deterrent example philosophical system that would instigate the position that Ford Motor Company was to blame would be Kant s ethical philosophy . K ant s theory placed emphasis on the categorical imperative , which he considered the supreme normal of faith (The Internet cyclopedia of PhilosophyThe categorical imperative , the ultimate moral principle for Kant , is the principle to guide all human actions . It requires entry with the criteria that an action be rational , objective , and freely chosen (The Internet cyclopedia of Philosophy . Kant s theory is based on concepts of reason and work . Subjective criteria are irrelevantIn the given case , the rule that it is acceptable to forego safety standards in the spare-time activity of profit could neer pass the criteria provided by Kant . Reason would not support such(prenominal) a position , since it would lead to...If you neediness to get a overflowing essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper