Wednesday, December 19, 2018

'National Health Care Spending Essay\r'

'Introduction\r\nwellness cargon in the united States is provided by many distinct organizations. Accordingly, the US nosecount Bureau (2010) reported that wellness make do facilities be large-scalely owned and operated by private vault of heaven businesses. While sixty-two percent of hospitals atomic number 18 non-profit, 20% are g everyplacenment owned, and 18% are for-profit. Furthermore, 60â€65% of wellness flush provision and using up comes from programs such(prenominal) as Medi interest, Medicaid, TRICARE, the Children’s wellness Insurance Program, and the Veterans Health Administration. Most of the population under 67 is some(prenominal) insured by themselves or a family extremity’s employer, buy wellness insurance on their own, and the remainder are uninsured. Health insurance for earth sector employees is primarily provided by the government.\r\nStill, the unite States has a life expectancy of 78.4 years at birth, up from 75.2 years in 199 0, and is ranked 50th among 221 terra firmas, and twenty-seventh out of the 34 industrialized countries, down from twentieth in 1990. Of 17 mellowed-income countries studied by the matter lends of Health in 2013, the united States had the highest or near-highest preponderance of infant mortality, heart and lung disease, sexually transmitted infections, teen pregnancies, injuries, homicides, and disability. Together, such issues place the U.S. at the bottom of the enumerate for life expectancy. On average, a U.S. male fuel be expected to live almost quadruplet a few(prenominal)er years than those in the top-ranked country (NIH, 2013). thesis Statement\r\nAs dismal as the statistics are, in recent years, policy makers as well as leading economists prevail focused a vast amount of attention on aggregate using up increases in health assist and how health pity pass impacts the united States economy. Thereby, specific emphasis has been tending(p) to identifying and exami ning distinctive factors that have contributed to outlay growth, and proposing solutions for reduction. Seemingly, factors that have contributed to spending growth encompass changes in health vexation utilization, population demographics, price inflation, and advances in checkup engineering science. Thus, as more and more advanced scientific technology is developed the damages associated with providing quality health perplexity increases.\r\nWith that said, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), the join States spent more on health care per capita ($8,608), and more on health care as percentage of its GDP (17.2%), than any other nation in 2011. Yet, the United States ranked last in the quality of health care among similar countries, and nones United States care costs the most. Similarly, in a 2013 Bloomberg be of nations with the most efficient health care governances, the United States ranks 46th among the 48 countries included in the study. The U.S. nosecount Bureau reported that 49.9 million residents, 16.3% of the population, were uninsured in 2010 (up from 49.0 million residents, 16.1% of the population, in 2009).\r\nIn addition, a 2004 institute of Medicine (IOM) report said: â€Å"The United States is among the few industrialized nations in the world that does not take on access to health care for its population.” Further, â€Å"with the exception of Mexico, Turkey, and the United States, all of the other countries had achieved universal or near-universal (at least(prenominal) 98.4% insured) coverage of their populations by 1990;” and recent evidence demonstrates that escape of health insurance causes some 45,000 to 48,000 unnecessary deaths both year in the United States. In 2007, 62.1% of filers for bankruptcies claimed high medical expenses, and 25% of all senior citizens declare bankruptcy overdue to medical expenses, and 43% are forced to mortgage or sell their immemorial residence.\r\nOn March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and low-priced Care Act (PPACA) became law, providing for major changes in health insurance. The medical system has been forced to change pattern procedures to meet federal official regulations. The law includes a large number of health-related provisions to take effect over the next four years, including expanding Medicaid eligibility for people making up to 133% of FPL, subsidizing insurance premiums for peoples making up to 400% of FPL ($88,000 for family of 4) so their maximum â€Å"out-of-pocket” pay provide be from 2% to 9.8% of income for annual premium, providing incentives for businesses to provide health care benefits, prohibiting denial of coverage and denial of claims based on pre-existing conditions, establishing health insurance exchanges, prohibiting insurers from establishing annual spending caps and support for medical research.\r\nThe costs of these provisions are offset by a variety of taxes, fees, and cost-saving measures, such a s new Medicare taxes for high-income brackets, taxes on indoor tanning, cuts to the Medicare return program in favor of traditional Medicare, and fees on medical devices and pharmaceutical companies; there is also a tax penalty for citizens who do not obtain health insurance (unless(prenominal) they are exempt due to low income or other reasons). The Congressional work out Office estimates that the net effect (including the reconciliation act) will be a reduction in the federal deficit by $143 billion over the scratch line decade. Conclusion\r\nIn conclusion, in contrast to the careen that rising health care spending at the Federal and State level decreases economic growth, and employee health care costs decreases job growth, a commonsense argument, could also be made that rising health care spending has important benefits, often outweighing the increase costs. I submit that improvements in quality may produce a cause and effect whereby, the cost of medical care is decreased. Subsequently, increased health care spending improves increases in access to new technologies, providing both new options of treatment and treatment for a greater number of individuals; which provides for healthier employees. Moreover, health care spending growth is more likely to create health care jobs, increases wages for health care workers, expands local anesthetic tax revenues, and increases demand for related goods and services.\r\nWe, as Americans, proclaim to be the richest, strongest, and greatest country, yet we stand by and watch homeless citizens sleeping on the streets, children vent to bed at night hungry, and citizens dying because they omit health insurance. The Affordable Care Act is a good start, however we must keep legislators who even up the bill from chipping away at it. Health care should be a human right, not a privilege. For example, in whitethorn 2011, the subject of Vermont became the maiden state to pass legislation establishing a Single-Payer hea lth care system. The legislation, k promptlyn as Act 48, establishes health care in the state as a â€Å"human right” and lays the responsibility on the state to provide a health care system which best meets the needs of the citizens of Vermont. The state is currently in the studying phase of how best to implement this system.\r\nOf the 26.2 million foreign immigrants living in the US in 1998, 62.9% were non-U.S. citizens. In 1997, 34.3% of non-U.S. citizens living in America did not have health insurance coverage as opposed to the 14.2% of native-born Americans who do not have health insurance coverage. Among those immigrants who became citizens, 18.5% were uninsured, as opposed to noncitizens, who are 43.6% uninsured. In each age and income group, immigrants are less likely to have health insurance. With the recent healthcare changes, many legal immigrants with various immigration statuses now are able to qualify for affordable health insurance. We need to push for more. T he cost for individuals that use requisite rooms as port of entry to medical care far exceeds obtaining a primary care provider.\r\nReferences\r\nInstitute of Medicine (2004). Retrieved from http://.www.institutesofmedicine, whitethorn 09, 2014.\r\nNational Institute of Health (2013). Retrieved from http://.www.nationalinstituteofhealth, May 10, 2014.\r\nU. S. Census Bureau (2010). Retrieved from http://.www.uscensusbureau, May 10, 2014.\r\nWorld Health Organization (2014). Retrieved from http://.www.worldhealthorganization, May 10, 2014.\r\ (2014). Retrieved from May 10,\r\n2014\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.