Friday, February 1, 2019
Death Penalty :: essays research papers fc
1st Negative matter You have heard from the affirmative side and you whitethorn disagree or agree with some of their points, but the reality is that their design will non and derrierenot succeed in right aways society. True, on paper the plan looks very good, but it will not work. Todays lay out system, with the final stage penalty is much better off hence without it. The invalidating side, which my partner and I represent, feels that the death penalty should not be abolished and that todays system, which allows states to choose if they want to impose the death penalty, should continue to be used. It is true that innocent people have been executed, but that number is minuscular comp atomic number 18d to the amount of true criminals that are rightfully executed. There is 28-step procedure necessity before both person can be given a death sentence. By having the process consist of numerous steps and involving more different people, human error is greatly reduced. The deat h penalty is not racially or gender bias, much to the contrary of what the affirmative team believes. The fact is that custody commit more crimes, so they will be convicted at a greater rate then women. The dimension of men to women on death row and executed is 681 or 340050 (NAACP Spring 1996). From 1976-1994, men committed 7 times as many murders as women or a 71 ratio (Sourcebook 94). Therefore, it may be statically shown that men are, by a 701 ratio, more likely to be on death row then are women. Like gender bias, racial bias is nonexistent in the rulings involving the death penalty. Whites represent 56% of those executed, and blacks 38% (NAACP Summer of 1996). The other 6% are other minorities. The death penalty is not bias to any race, but by just looking at the numbers it may seem that it is. The total populations of each race will give the john of bias, but that is not true. The affirmative side also argues that the cost of emotional state in prison without parole is muc h cheaper then the cost of the death penalty, but this, like their charge of bias, is also untrue. The death penalty is millions cheaper then life without parole in the long run, but when our numbers are compared to the affirmatives numbers no right or premature conclusion can be reached. No one team can give impartial numbers since studies by both sides are bias.